instead of writing i decided to speak...again
i would totally go watch this movie again if someone picks me up on a given time that is according to my schedule.
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Friday, April 23, 2010
thoughts:i'ma guitarist...
instead of writing, i decided to speak.
this is still a test..
this is still a test..
Labels:
thoughts
Thursday, April 22, 2010
video:booty fairy!
ive been very lazy in blogging. so this is what i give ya.
also looks like its the time of the season again for me to post AN RKO A DAY!!!! which means i'm just doin it for myself only and only for myself to watch.
Labels:
video
Saturday, April 17, 2010
shorts:hotels and wrestling?
i was just talking to yit yee about potential industries to work on for an assignemnt. i was checking out the mohegan sun resort which leads em to goin to this website. now the weird thing is that when i saw the front page where it says "a world at play"...notice something weird? or funny?why the fuck is the picture of chris jericho giving the original walls of jericho to rey mysterio? i can't see the logic.
they're not from vegas,
none of them are original americans,
they don't do broadway like celine dion,
they're not too good looking,
tell me why?
they're not from vegas,
none of them are original americans,
they don't do broadway like celine dion,
they're not too good looking,
tell me why?
Labels:
shorts
shorts:my ass is burning man.
well this is a new label to help me express my short personal views which i don't feel like blogging. so basically these are my lazy post.
i exercise. now i feel tired.my ass feels like i'm goin to explode
i exercise. now i feel tired.my ass feels like i'm goin to explode
Labels:
shorts
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
wrestling:FIREBALL FIREBALL OMG!
taht should be the undertaker's finisher. something like what tajiri had with his green mist.
Labels:
wrestling
music::yes. justin bieber.
i gotta explain why am i posting this. i'm bored recently(again). and you know sometimes boredom gives you easy acceptance towards a certain things(attack attack!) just to get entertain for that few minutes before returning to your own boredom routine again. and you know you can't stick to one genre all the time so you gotta like chill down at times and listen to other shit.
reason why i like this song was .i was bored. i saw some parody which got me hooked and i eventually like this song. so...ROCK ON!
1.01 mark - is he touching her boobs? i wonder.
1.58 mark - EPIC DANCE MOVE. EVAR!
i wonder why songs like these always have the music video plot like after a series of dancing and walking around, the dude gets the chick.
reason why i like this song was .i was bored. i saw some parody which got me hooked and i eventually like this song. so...ROCK ON!
1.01 mark - is he touching her boobs? i wonder.
1.58 mark - EPIC DANCE MOVE. EVAR!
i wonder why songs like these always have the music video plot like after a series of dancing and walking around, the dude gets the chick.
Labels:
music
Monday, April 12, 2010
thoughts:price,quality, and quantity on food.
kam tze, if your reading this, this is something similar to your quantity or quality post.
i wanna talk about the quantity over quality in terms of food. here's the thing, [note:i'm speaking from a pretty general perspective] i'm sure everyone knows that high class places like maybe some restaurant in kl maybe say porkalicious?offers great quality food , service etc. the food quality as in it taste good, its unique, its something special that only this place offers. but the thing is...its just too fuckin little. i'm a dude that loves to eat man. and trust me, i eat a lot. and when restaurants like these charges so fuckin much for so little, it made me think, if i'm paying [which i'm not], will i get satisfied? truly the answer i mean MY answer is no. i could not stand a fuckin 300 bill for over something that i couldn't get really full with. and the thing about these restaurants that offers quality over quantity food takes their own time like they fuckin own the time machine but they don't. it takes like what 45 minutes for the next dish to come? that's bullshit man. so at the end of that night in porkalicious, kl ... food is great, but i'm not satisfied. part of that was contributed with, terrible noise of plates breaking, annoying happy birthday songs, and long waits in between dishes. but the most important thing of the dissatisfaction is.... HIGH PRICE...SMALL QUANTITY....[note that this post might not apply to specifically you, chun kiat.. since you practically don't eat but oh well] [lets just forget bout rent and etc also]
and then now we look at the quantity perspective. well personally you already know that i eat a lot. but at the same time i demand good food. and lets just say my taste buds are like commoners. i like mamak,hawker stalls,high class restaurants, fusion, western, chinese, pasar malams etc etc etc. the thing bout these food unlike high class places, is that it offers the right quantity at a specific price that is worth it. now the quality might not be as good compared to higher class places, but it does certainly occupies every single room in your stomach and lets be frank, cheese naan is good isn;t it?or even ramli burger. [i seriously think ramli burger is nicer than most burgers in mcdonalds due to its juiciness.]. ok like say maybe you go to some place that offers small portion, but charges a lot, yea its good but its not fulfilling. then you come out from that restaurant and you walk by fatman steamboat and you grab all the sticks you want and no matter what, it will not be as expensive as 300 bucks but you get to reach the level of truly satisfied of what you just had. at least you know something is in your stomach. so it is sort of like this LOWER PRICE.....BIGGER QUANTITY... [note that lower price doesn't mean a reduction of quality. lots of places are cheap and nice too] [we are also ignoring the fact of difference in food genre]
so would you choose this and think bout this
....YOUR PAYING THE MEAL!
[the pictures are just representation of my point between price,quality and quantity.]
[whatever this is. price:[you can pay by credit card and you most probably need to if your not rich like me] [oh yea we are also assuming the fact that we all somehow stay in 2 storey house and no big big banglo oh..]
or would you get this? again your paying for the meal.
[kfc snack plate.price:11 bucks]
[the pictures are just representation of my point between price,quality and quantity.]
well the real question is....would you go for
HIGH PRICE, HIGH QUALITY,LOW QUANTITY?
OR
LOW PRICE,DECENT QUALITY, HIGH QUANTITY?
also i want you to think bout this. say lets just say you like this food which is priced reasonable and it taste good. after so many years of eating it and it remains the same, the food is suddenly raised in price and have gone through a slight reduction in its portion. tell me honestly, is the first thing that came to your mind, "the food doesn't taste as good as last time"? honestly...and this gotta be something you've been eating for a long long time. more than a year.
btw, one of the restaurants that i think is balanced in price, quantity and quality is chilis. love em.
i wanna talk about the quantity over quality in terms of food. here's the thing, [note:i'm speaking from a pretty general perspective] i'm sure everyone knows that high class places like maybe some restaurant in kl maybe say porkalicious?offers great quality food , service etc. the food quality as in it taste good, its unique, its something special that only this place offers. but the thing is...its just too fuckin little. i'm a dude that loves to eat man. and trust me, i eat a lot. and when restaurants like these charges so fuckin much for so little, it made me think, if i'm paying [which i'm not], will i get satisfied? truly the answer i mean MY answer is no. i could not stand a fuckin 300 bill for over something that i couldn't get really full with. and the thing about these restaurants that offers quality over quantity food takes their own time like they fuckin own the time machine but they don't. it takes like what 45 minutes for the next dish to come? that's bullshit man. so at the end of that night in porkalicious, kl ... food is great, but i'm not satisfied. part of that was contributed with, terrible noise of plates breaking, annoying happy birthday songs, and long waits in between dishes. but the most important thing of the dissatisfaction is.... HIGH PRICE...SMALL QUANTITY....[note that this post might not apply to specifically you, chun kiat.. since you practically don't eat but oh well] [lets just forget bout rent and etc also]
and then now we look at the quantity perspective. well personally you already know that i eat a lot. but at the same time i demand good food. and lets just say my taste buds are like commoners. i like mamak,hawker stalls,high class restaurants, fusion, western, chinese, pasar malams etc etc etc. the thing bout these food unlike high class places, is that it offers the right quantity at a specific price that is worth it. now the quality might not be as good compared to higher class places, but it does certainly occupies every single room in your stomach and lets be frank, cheese naan is good isn;t it?or even ramli burger. [i seriously think ramli burger is nicer than most burgers in mcdonalds due to its juiciness.]. ok like say maybe you go to some place that offers small portion, but charges a lot, yea its good but its not fulfilling. then you come out from that restaurant and you walk by fatman steamboat and you grab all the sticks you want and no matter what, it will not be as expensive as 300 bucks but you get to reach the level of truly satisfied of what you just had. at least you know something is in your stomach. so it is sort of like this LOWER PRICE.....BIGGER QUANTITY... [note that lower price doesn't mean a reduction of quality. lots of places are cheap and nice too] [we are also ignoring the fact of difference in food genre]
so would you choose this and think bout this
....YOUR PAYING THE MEAL!
[the pictures are just representation of my point between price,quality and quantity.]
[whatever this is. price:[you can pay by credit card and you most probably need to if your not rich like me] [oh yea we are also assuming the fact that we all somehow stay in 2 storey house and no big big banglo oh..]
or would you get this? again your paying for the meal.
[kfc snack plate.price:11 bucks]
[the pictures are just representation of my point between price,quality and quantity.]
well the real question is....would you go for
HIGH PRICE, HIGH QUALITY,LOW QUANTITY?
OR
LOW PRICE,DECENT QUALITY, HIGH QUANTITY?
also i want you to think bout this. say lets just say you like this food which is priced reasonable and it taste good. after so many years of eating it and it remains the same, the food is suddenly raised in price and have gone through a slight reduction in its portion. tell me honestly, is the first thing that came to your mind, "the food doesn't taste as good as last time"? honestly...and this gotta be something you've been eating for a long long time. more than a year.
btw, one of the restaurants that i think is balanced in price, quantity and quality is chilis. love em.
Labels:
thoughts
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
thoughts: working hard/enough to live rich/average
after a few days of all emo-ed on shawn michaels retirement, i'm back to write another post that i myself acknowledged as a real post. its just yesterday that i spoke to a good friend of mine, kat wai about the difference of
- working really hard to get rich to enjoy a realy good lifestyle (like semi-ds or banglos, latest toys, nice cars like maybe BMW, high end guitars,you get what i mean)
or
- just working enough to get a decent living because whats the point of working so hard when your not enjoying life?
(ok kat wai i know the sentences weren't like this last night, but this is a blog, i gotta at least
smoothen the sentence.) this is sort of a common issue that has people arguing around or debating, jsut basically talking bout it. here's a couple of answers which i receive from my friends and note that they are people around my age.
loanshark: just really harrd
sure really hard man
thts the way
ill chose this cause i love cash man
eddy: (his shit gets deeper and deeper and i couldn't include everything. you know americans likes to get more detailed than malaysians) (not saying anything bad bout you yea eddy)
i want to have a comfortable lifestyle
but i also want to feel like i am putting in effort to better myself, whether it be mentally,
or physically, or whatever
i think everyone likes to have a certain amount of money
and probably, with the path i'm taking, could make comfortable finances a reasonable goal
choi yin:i think i will work vry hard for few years to save a certain amount of money
after tat i will work normally
chor yuen: if im single..
nono..
cause if u don work now..
and earn more money
next time when u are old..
who want u o..
chen voon:chen voon says:
coz i Dun wan many $$$$
but lay on the bed in hospiTal
or cant bring any $$$$
when i die
vincent is 20 says:
what?
i tak faham la(i don't fuckin understand what your saying)
*only chen voon answers the second option, while the rest goes for the first one excepts for eddy who goes with the "it depends" kinda answer.
i know this question have very little justificaiton of how hard a person should work or how good is the good lifestyle means. i'm writing this because there's lack of justification in these sentences whenever people ask me this quesiton coz lets faced it, many people ask this question and also money can't buy everyting which i might blog later on. so anyways, its really about the degree or extent towards how hard you would want to work and to the extent of how much you want to earn. i think if money minded person would probably choose the first option coz i would assume they understand the value of money more and only money can buy things you wish to have right now. on the other hand, a few people have told me bout whats the point of working hard and not being to enjoy life as well? that kinda get me thinking also, which job is not hard geh? unless when you have to work maybe from monday till saturday,morning till midnight. if you are already working like this you probably would be in the first option already.(note that this doesn't count if you just started working)
well personally from a business student's perspective and seeing money is everything, i would say i would go with the first option. coz there's nothing better than being able to buy things you want whenever you wish to have it. but of course there would be price to pay and thats working hard for it. but if you think bout it, like what choi yin and chor yuen told me, working hard early gives you the right to retire early or working less harder in the future. so at the end of the day for me its better to work hard early when your young, you got not much commitments, so that you can buy shit in the future.(note that this doesn't apply when you say i work hard also no get rich. getting rich depends on luck also)
so...
WHAT WOULD YOU CHOOSE TO GET A GOOD LIFESTYLE?
working hard (like having little social life, constantly dealing with paper works and socializing just for the sake of moving forward, spending little time with your love ones, sacrificing the things you lik to do lik guitars and etc) to get a can buy everything lifestyle (tangible things yea,bitches don't reply me with shit like money can't buy love, appreciation, gratitude and etc.)
or
working enough(work for other people, have standard work time, gets paid averagely, doesn't involve politics to climb the ladder of success faster) to get a decent living which allows you to enjoy life in the moment.(like staying in trend, enjoying the latest things that came out, spending time with friends while were young and beautiful(rip off from carrie underwood).
note* i already tried to be as detailed i can be in the two sentences i proposed for you to choose. please don't be a dick and said something else i couldn't write on and because i'm too lazy to list down.
- working really hard to get rich to enjoy a realy good lifestyle (like semi-ds or banglos, latest toys, nice cars like maybe BMW, high end guitars,you get what i mean)
or
- just working enough to get a decent living because whats the point of working so hard when your not enjoying life?
(ok kat wai i know the sentences weren't like this last night, but this is a blog, i gotta at least
smoothen the sentence.) this is sort of a common issue that has people arguing around or debating, jsut basically talking bout it. here's a couple of answers which i receive from my friends and note that they are people around my age.
loanshark: just really harrd
sure really hard man
thts the way
ill chose this cause i love cash man
eddy: (his shit gets deeper and deeper and i couldn't include everything. you know americans likes to get more detailed than malaysians) (not saying anything bad bout you yea eddy)
i want to have a comfortable lifestyle
but i also want to feel like i am putting in effort to better myself, whether it be mentally,
or physically, or whatever
i think everyone likes to have a certain amount of money
and probably, with the path i'm taking, could make comfortable finances a reasonable goal
choi yin:i think i will work vry hard for few years to save a certain amount of money
after tat i will work normally
chor yuen: if im single..
nono..
cause if u don work now..
and earn more money
next time when u are old..
who want u o..
chen voon:chen voon says:
coz i Dun wan many $$$$
but lay on the bed in hospiTal
or cant bring any $$$$
when i die
vincent is 20 says:
what?
i tak faham la(i don't fuckin understand what your saying)
*only chen voon answers the second option, while the rest goes for the first one excepts for eddy who goes with the "it depends" kinda answer.
i know this question have very little justificaiton of how hard a person should work or how good is the good lifestyle means. i'm writing this because there's lack of justification in these sentences whenever people ask me this quesiton coz lets faced it, many people ask this question and also money can't buy everyting which i might blog later on. so anyways, its really about the degree or extent towards how hard you would want to work and to the extent of how much you want to earn. i think if money minded person would probably choose the first option coz i would assume they understand the value of money more and only money can buy things you wish to have right now. on the other hand, a few people have told me bout whats the point of working hard and not being to enjoy life as well? that kinda get me thinking also, which job is not hard geh? unless when you have to work maybe from monday till saturday,morning till midnight. if you are already working like this you probably would be in the first option already.(note that this doesn't count if you just started working)
well personally from a business student's perspective and seeing money is everything, i would say i would go with the first option. coz there's nothing better than being able to buy things you want whenever you wish to have it. but of course there would be price to pay and thats working hard for it. but if you think bout it, like what choi yin and chor yuen told me, working hard early gives you the right to retire early or working less harder in the future. so at the end of the day for me its better to work hard early when your young, you got not much commitments, so that you can buy shit in the future.(note that this doesn't apply when you say i work hard also no get rich. getting rich depends on luck also)
so...
WHAT WOULD YOU CHOOSE TO GET A GOOD LIFESTYLE?
working hard (like having little social life, constantly dealing with paper works and socializing just for the sake of moving forward, spending little time with your love ones, sacrificing the things you lik to do lik guitars and etc) to get a can buy everything lifestyle (tangible things yea,bitches don't reply me with shit like money can't buy love, appreciation, gratitude and etc.)
or
working enough(work for other people, have standard work time, gets paid averagely, doesn't involve politics to climb the ladder of success faster) to get a decent living which allows you to enjoy life in the moment.(like staying in trend, enjoying the latest things that came out, spending time with friends while were young and beautiful(rip off from carrie underwood).
note* i already tried to be as detailed i can be in the two sentences i proposed for you to choose. please don't be a dick and said something else i couldn't write on and because i'm too lazy to list down.
Labels:
thoughts
Monday, April 5, 2010
wrestling:shawn michaels
another wrestlemania has come and go. the most anticipated match was the match of the night and no doubt be match of the year jsut liek las tyear. if you watch wrestlemania you'd know i'm talking bout shawn michaels vs. teh undertaker. i haven't been catching up the build up on raw so i have absolutely no idea its streak vs. career stipulation until after i was just holding the dvd at my couz place. well the match isn;t as good as last year but it sure is hell 5 stars. i was sort of in total distraction mode when i watch raw where hbk gave his farewell speech. kinda made me miss wrestling a lot suddenly.
on another note, randy orton has just became a babyface. proabbly bigger than john cena now.
oh man shawn michaels.....retired.....oh nooo
on another note, randy orton has just became a babyface. proabbly bigger than john cena now.
oh man shawn michaels.....retired.....oh nooo
Labels:
wrestling
Thursday, April 1, 2010
thoughts: my appraisal for lectures
this post is just mainly for my coursemates...if they are reading this.
joanna's appraisal
joanna's appraisal
the sucky appraisal system which requires us to do 3 or 2 times of appraisal just to view the results.
joanna's appraisal
joanna's appraisal
the sucky appraisal system which requires us to do 3 or 2 times of appraisal just to view the results.
Labels:
thoughts
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)